Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Google move hints at Chrome for Android

Android's unbranded browser is coming back into the WebKit fold.

The software--called simply "Browser" on Android phones and tablets--is based on the open-source browser engine called WebKit. It's long been disassociated from it, though, and now Google is trying to reunite the projects in a move that could portend the arrival of a branded Chrome on Android.

"We're looking forward to a much better collaboration with the WebKit community," Google's Andrei Popescu said yesterday in a mailing list message flagged by new Chrome developer Peter Beverloo and spotted by TechCrunch.

Convergence between the Android browser and Chrome seems inevitable. Tablets bring a more PC-like experience to browsing, and Google is of course keen on tablets with the arrival of version 3 of Android, aka Honeycomb. Google TV, also based on Android, has a browser that sports the Chrome brand. But what's been keeping them apart?

At the Google I/O show in May, Chrome Senior Vice President Sundar Pichai said it's because, although the browsers share some common code, the Android browser is "not based on Chromium," the open-source version of Chrome. The implication was that the Chrome brand name carries a certain promise of Web page compatibility that the Android browser couldn't necessarily fulfill.

By merging with the WebKit project, though, that barrier will be overcome. "We're fully committed to maintaining this new flavor of the Chromium port of WebKit," Popescu said in the message.

And when Beverloo filed a WebKit but to track the project, he said, "The Android Browser has come to a point where it shares enough code with Chrome to entirely reuse the Chromium port of WebKit."

The change is good news, according to Dion Almaer, a browser and Web development expert who mentioned the move on the Function Source blog today.

"Having watched my team deal with painful Android WebKit bugs for the last few weeks, I am very glad to read more news that the Android WebKit is getting Chrome-ier," Almaer said. "When you go deep on making a rich Web application work there, you find sharp corners all over the shop."

In other words, he expects some of the compatibility issues separating Chrome and the Android browser to diminish.

Google wouldn't comment on its branding plans for the browser. In a statement today, the company said:

The Android Browser and Chrome already share a lot of code, such as the same WebKit rendering engine, V8 JavaScript engine, and HTTP [Hypertext Transfer Protocol] stack. We expect them to continue to share more code over time and have actually started harmonizing our efforts so that Google will have just one port of WebKit to maintain. Beyond that, we have nothing further to share at this time.

It seems to me the Ice Cream Sandwich version of Android, due later this year, would be a great time to make the branding change. This version of the mobile operating system is designed to bridge the current divide between Android 2.x for phones and Android 3.x for tablets and to make it easier for Android app programmers to support multiple devices.

But re-integrating the Android browser with WebKit will take time--and it requires more than just Google's Chrome programmers working with Google's Android browser programmers. WebKit began as an Apple project spawned from the earlier KHTML browser engine used in the KDE interface for Linux, so other developers are involved.

One potential benefit to Google's move is a more mature mobile browser for others. Safari on iOS uses WebKit, and so do browsers for new BlackBerry phones, Samsung Bada phones, Hewlett-Packard's ill-fated WebOS, and more. Open-source software makes sharing software easier, and Google's goals with browsers are not so much to profit directly from its own product as to improve browsing in general so the Web becomes more powerful.

Google sometimes keeps variations of open-source projects in-house. The Linux kernel used in Android, for example, is fairly detached from the mainstream Linux kernel project maintained by Linus Torvalds. That doesn't violate any laws and gives Google the ability to control its own destiny a bit better, but as a practical matter, the open-source philosophy works better when projects aren't fragmented and out of sync.

It's a two-way road, too: Google should have an easier time incorporating others' changes into the Android browser. If Apple comes up with a clever CSS feature, for example, it'll be less effort for Google to incorporate it.

Thus, overall, Google's WebKit move with its Android browser seems helpful for Web developers, browser makers, and Android users. And one last point: there's no doubt that Google, which is sensitive to branding issues, would love to see that Chrome icon publicized on millions of smartphones.

How to Add Google+ to Your Mac's Menubar

These days, I keep multiple browsers open so I can keep track of all my work and personal items. As a staff member of WonderHowTo, a lot of my work is done through our Google Account, which is separate from my personal Google Account.

I really dislike the way Google currently handles having multiple accounts open, so I've resolved that issue by using Chrome for work matters, and Firefox for my Google+ account. This way, the two accounts don't conflict with each other, and I can get my work done with a minimum of fuss. Lately, though, it's been irritating using two different browsers, so I've been searching for a better solution.

I came across the Tab for Google+ app today, and decided to try it out. There is a free version, and a pro version, which does not have ads, and gives you the ability to chat. (Currently the pro version is only $0.99.) Created by FIPLAB, a company that creates beautiful and viral mobile applications, Tab for Google+ lets you replace your Google+ browser tab by putting your Google+ account in your menubar.

I tested out the free version (note: free for a limited time only), and downloaded it from the Mac App Store.

Tab for Google+ was easy to install. It downloaded quickly, and opened in the Launchpad when completed. All you have to do is click on the Tab for G+ icon, and it opens up the Google+ login on the top right menu task bar.

Tab for Google+ asks if you want to run the program when you log onto your computer. This feature is convenient if you like to be on Google+ all the time. If you change your mind about this setting, you can go to Preferences and reverse your decision.

The Tab for Google+ app basically looks like your mobile Google+ app. It's the same size and shape, and although you have the option of viewing the app in Desktop mode, I don't recommend it, since the view is skewed. It's really easy to scroll down your stream, view comments, view individual people's posts, and post comments.

Overall, I really like this app, but I don't think it's going to replace my Firefox browser just yet. I had issues trying to retrieve my circles, and I was unable to click on any link to open it. Clicking on individual people worked fine, but clicking on posts did not work.


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Major Google Updates Documented

SEOmoz announced they have published the Google Algorithm Change document detailing all “major updates” that happened since the Boston update in 2003.

SEOmoz did it with style in this graphical document:

While I agree with a lot of the updates listed here, I had worked up a list of my own a few months ago. I was extremely selective and this it he list I came up with the list below.

My Google Update List:

  • Fritz (Summer 2003)
  • Florida (November 2003)
  • Austin Update (Jan 2004)
  • The Sandbox (April 2004)
  • Bourbon (May 2005)
  • Big Daddy (October 2005)
  • Supplemental (Jan 2007)
  • Paid Links (October 2007)
  • Dewey Update (Mar 2008)
  • Vince / Brand (March 2009)
  • May Day (May 2010)
  • Caffeine (June 2010)
  • Scraper Filter (Jan. 2011)
  • Panda (February 2011)

SEOmoz Google Update List:

  • Google Toolbar – December 2000
  • Boston – February 2003
  • Cassandra – April 2003
  • Dominic – May 2003
  • Esmerelda – June 2003
  • Fritz – July 2003
  • Florida – November 2003
  • Austin – January 2004
  • Brandy – February 2004
  • Google IPO – August 2004
  • Nofollow – January 2005
  • Allegra – February 2005
  • Bourbon – May 2005
  • XML Sitemaps – June 2005
  • Personalized Search – June 2005
  • Gilligan – September 2005
  • Google Local/Maps – October 2005
  • Jagger – October 2005
  • Big Daddy – December 2005
  • Supplemental Index – November 2006
  • Universal Search – May 2007
  • Buffy – June 2007
  • Dewey – April 2008
  • Google Suggest – August 2008
  • Vince – February 2009
  • Rel-canonical Tag – February 2009
  • Caffeine – August 2009
  • Real-time Search – December 2009
  • Google Places – April 2010
  • May Day – May 2010
  • Brand Update – August 2010
  • Google Instant – September 2010
  • Instant Previews – November 2010
  • Social Signals – December 2010
  • Overstock.com Penalty – January 2011
  • Panda/Farmer – February 23, 2011
  • The +1 Button – March 30, 2011
  • Panda 2.0 – April 11, 2011
  • Panda 2.1 – May 9, 2011
  • Schema.org – June 2, 2011
  • Panda 2.2 – June 21, 2011
  • Google+ – June 28, 2011
  • Panda 2.3 – July 23, 2011

Both SEOmoz and I pulled a lot of this data from this WebmasterWorld thread, which has always done a great job of documenting Google updates. I supplemented my list above with the Google Updates category on the Search Engine Roundtable.

The main difference is that SEOmoz is also including major user interface changes and none specific algorithm changes, including specific penalties.

Overall, it is really good for SEOs and webmasters to get an idea of how Google has updated their index, algorithms and penalties over time so that you can better anticipate the future changes coming from Google.


Source:- http://searchengineland.com

Google Updates iOS Search App With Instant Pages

Google updated its Search app for iOS today with the addition of several new features that will make searching faster and more convenient. Most noticeable is the addition of a filter button in the search bar that makes it easy to quickly select which categories to search under. Also added is support for Google’s Instant Pages feature, which was first introduced for the Chrome desktop browser back in June.

The Google Search app is much more powerful than its Safari browser counterpart. Besides typing in your search query, you can input your search using speech as well as using photos from your phone’s camera. The latter utilizes the experimental Google Goggles feature and finds search results relevant to photos of books, DVDs, landmarks, logos, contact info, artwork, businesses, products, QR barcodes, and more.

The addition of the filter button lets you narrow down your search results by selecting categories from a drop-down menu. These categories include Everything, Images, Places, News, Shopping, Videos, Blogs, Discussions, and Apps. Speaking of Apps, this new update also makes it easier to launch Google apps such as Gmail, Calendar, News, Translate, Reader, and more.

Support for Instant Pages means that certain search results that Google predicts that you’re most likely to click on will pre-load in the background so that when you do click on the result the page appears instantly. However, our attempts at trying out this feature by searching for “IRS” did not produce an instant page load of irs.gov. This could be blamed on our wireless data connection or that irs.gov was not predicted as the best result for that particular search. Hopefully, this feature will continue to be tweaked so we’ll see a more noticeable difference in page load times.

The app also has a help overlay that highlights the individual features. And swiping down from the top of the screen reveals the sign-in and settings options, which usually remain hidden so that more screen space is given for search results.



Source:- http://www.slashgear.com

Google Updates Gmail and Docs for all users

The fine folks at Google have announced today their newest set of updates for the popular mail and cloud-based document editors Gmail and Google Docs. In these updates you’ll find several innovations brought to you straight from what once was Google Labs and has now been split into teams: Gmail Labs and a series of groups working on Docs. Two of Google’s most popular web-based applications have just gotten better – let’s check out how!

Gmail

Google’s mail app will first of all have a brand new inbox preview pane. This pane will now allow you to scroll through your giant lists of messages and their contents and see small previews of the messages as you go. You can also mark messages “read” from here now as well. This feature in particular needs to be enabled from the Labs area in Settings – though it may come out for all users soon – and you’ve got the choice of either a vertical or horizontal split in your Gmail window.

Your Gmail interface has also been improved while you’re looking at it in a mobile browser, especially if you’re looking at it through a high-resolution display. You can also pull down your menu to activate a “release to refresh” feature. Check out more on this update [here.]

Google Docs

Google Docs is about to get some large interface improvements, this included in a much larger Google-wide project to simplify and streamline their applications. You’ll notice these changes falling very much in line with the aesthetic of their Google+ social networking project. This update will be rolling out to everyone eventually, while you can peek at this look by hitting “Try the new look” under the gear icon in your upper right. There are a whole bunch of new keyboard shortcuts now in play as well, typing “?” inside Docs will bring up a cheat sheet to see them all.

New chart types, and chart improvements for documents and drawings

There are automatic spreadsheet function snippets throughout many Google apps such as Google Translate. When you see a spreadsheet such as the one posted here, you’ll be able to type into a cell as you normally would any spreadsheet, but this will bring up a list of matching functions instantly, each of them selectable. Each of these functions have a hover feature which tells you what they do.

Spreadsheet charts have been made much more powerful and easier to work with on the whole, creating a chart now as simple as copying and pasting to embed into a document or drawing. There are several types of charts to choose from now, those being candlestick, combo, GeoMaps, and TreeMaps.

What this means for you, the user

As always, these updates will be rolling out to you immediately if not soon. You wont have to do anything special to work with these improvements, just keep on working as you usually do and the goodness will come to you. That said – have any of you been using these updates and have NOT been enjoying them?



Source:- http://www.slashgear.com

Thursday, August 18, 2011

A to Z guide to Google+

A - Another Social Networking site – Or should I say, another social networking site from Google. *phew* A fter Google Wave failed to create any waves and everyone asked Google Buzz to Buzz off, this is Google’s third attempt at taking Facebook head on (not considering Orkut as it was developed before Facebook became famous).

B – Businesses (separate acc. St rategy) – Google doesn’t want any company, business or product to have an account on Google+. Not right now, at least. They’re completely clear with their strategy and currently, all the accounts are only for Homo sapiens. Google+ has a separate strategy for businesses and they’re right now busy refining the last bits. In Product Manager, Chr istian Olsten’s words, “We have been watching Google+ take shape over the last week and we’ve seen some really great companies get involved. But frankly we know our product as it stands is not optimally suited to their needs. In fact, it was kind of an awkward moment for us when we asked Ford for his (or was it her?) gender!”

C – Circles – Google+ lets you add all your friends in different circles hence you can safely post that NSFW video and share it with your College Circle without worrying that your aunt from Amritsar will see it. You can also tell all your friends that you’re chilling in Goa while keeping your boss who’s in the Do-not-share-anything-with-Boss Circle, under the impression that you’re down with viral. Here are some other circles you can possibly use to categorise your friends. Facebook friends circle, Twitter friends circle, Real life friends circle, Colleagues-to- be-included-in-conversation-while-ranting-about-office circle, Family-members-you-can’t-tell-you-like-DK-Bose-song circle.

D – Di rect Messages – One of the most unique feature of G+ is how to Direct Message or Inbox someone. Technically speaking, there is no ‘Inbox’ feature. You never go in that shell where you feel safe, secure and private to make personal conversations like Facebook, Twitter & Orkut. Everything stays on the Timeline. Only difference is, you share the post only with that particular person(s) instead of sharing it with ‘Public’ or a circle. It can be classified as Direct Message in a way, but it will take some time and plenty of near-misses getting used to it, as that security of conversing in private folder cocoon is out of the window.


E – Equinox – Here, equinox can be referred to as that site which has found a balance between Facebook & Twitter and have engineered their way in combining best (functionalities) of both world, which in a parallel universe caters to the entire spectrum of users.

F – Following/followers – “People in your circles / People who’ve you in their circle” sounds more like “People you’re following / People who’re following you”. Google+’s friend list resemble Twitter more than Facebook.

G – Gtalk – Users have faced awkward situations where they’re being pinged on the Gtalk by people they’ve never added in the first place. Turns out, when you mutually add each other on G+, they get automatically added to your Gtalk. Given the fact that Google already has Gtalk, you don’t really expect them to program a new chat server, do you?

H – Hahaha gifs
- They logged on, they uploaded and they left. Since the first day, G+ has been littered with gifs and jpgs of how G+ has kicked FB’s butt. It’s either a cheap marketing ploy by Google where they’ve asked their employees to circulate these images or they’ve been created by anti-facebookers who’ve been waiting for someone to do come up with something that can rival FB.

I – Invitation – This yawn-worthy marketing tactic have now official earned a ‘cliché’ status. Like every new website/product wants you to think that they’re going to let only a select few mere mortals have the honour of testing their new thingy and to earn that once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, you will be required to cry out loud on Twitter and Facebook a million times to gain a so-called ‘invitation’ which will catapult you to Megatron levels of stardom and will change your life forever, even Google+ created the same noise where people were ready to give up their one limb to earn that coveted invitation to be one of the first people to have an account on Google+. Google+ created hype by giving out only a few thousand invitations in first few days which have now swelled to millions. In fact, Google did the same with Buzz and Wave. Grow up Google, instead of using such tactics, just make a great product, user base will take care of itself.

J - Just in time - G+ was launched on 28th June ‘11. Just 24 hours later, on 29th June, Myspace fell for just $35 million. MySpace was launched in 2003, a full year before Facebook, and it had peaked popularity in 2007 when it was valued at $12 billion. If symbolism is anything to go by, Google might just have launched G+ at a critical point of time. Just in time, as some would say.

K – Kleptomania – Maybe. Although, G+ has tried to stay away from the Facebook structure as much as possible and despite using terminologies as different from Facebook as possible, similarity to FB is pretty obvious. It's evident that G+ is nothing but a cross between Facebook and Twitter from features point of view.

L – Links – As of now, for an average user there is rarely anything to do on G+ apart from checking out tons of links that everyone is forwarding on G+. There are hardly any photos or any unique updates about friends which you haven’t read before on FB and/or twitter. It will take some time till the site gets populated and one can actually think of spending (read wasting) substantial amount of time on Google+.

M – Mute – All those people who’ve regretted congratulating a friend on his new relationship status after being bombarded with half a million notifications, will love this feature. In short, all of us. Mute allows us to mute notification about comments that people post on the same updates which we’ve commented on, hence, you will no longer feel shy to comment “RIP” on your friend’s “Getting married next week” update.

N – Nice, but not enough – Would G+ be able to overhaul Facebook can be answered in just 4 words, “(It's)Nice, but not enough.”

O – Omnipresent - Development of G+ has finally got Google, the omnipresent status. Google had every trick in the book, from Google Docs, Google Earth & Gmail to image sharing Flickr, video sharing YouTube & a blogging portal in Blogspot; a truly global social networking site was the only thing that was missing. With G+, it seems circle is complete. Although, some would argue that Google already had Orkut, but as mentioned, Google really wanted a GLOBAL social networking site and according to their Google Earth, the planet has 200+ countries and not just India & Brazil. Hence, G+.

P – Plus one – Plus One or +1 is equivalent to Facebook’s ‘Like’. But +1ing on Google+ won’t make it appear in your +1 section, so you needn’t worry that your family will come to know that you’ve +1ed Tara Reid’s Wardrobe Malfunction video unless you +1 it anywhere on net.

Q – Quintessentially minimalistic – Like everything Google, G+ too followed Google’s classic design philosophy and kept the site to bare minimum. Let’s enjoy the neatness and spaciousness that the site offers, till Adwords fills up the empty space.

R – Reality Check – Google+ is the fastest growing website but still it’s far from catching up with Facebook’s 750+ million users. And Facebook is just one step away from Gmail once @facebook.com mail id starts working in its full fledged avatar.

S – Sparks – There are no fan pages on G+ instead they have something known as Sparks which is essentially RSS feed of things that interests you, which may range from anything from “Aston Martin” to “Hot pics of Katrina Kaif”. Google seem to have employed some complex algorithm which probably takes into consideration page hits/rank from a little know search engine known as Google.com, to decide which news/links to throw up for your Sparks

T – 25 Million users – Google+ has already crossed the 25 million user mark is the fastest social networking website to reach this mark. Don’t get impressed by the fastest-social-networking-site-to-reach-25m-mark award, yet. Given Google’s might and the fact that it only took a Gmail account to register for Google+, it’s no surprise that they’ve achieved that feat in only a month’s time. The so-called “by invitation only” was only a marketing gimmick.

U – Unlimited photos – 1 album = 1000 photos. Unlimited albums = Unlimited Photos. Wohoo!!!

V – Video Chatting – Video Chat or Hangout as they call it, has to be G+ ‘s “deal maker”. The fact that one can video chat with up to 10 people at the same time is for sure a big plus.

W – Why should I be on G+? – That’s question you will be left asking yourself…So, what’s the point of G+? Well, let me ask you, what’s the point of any social networking site? Photos, Connectivity, News, Interaction, Staying in touch, Status Updates…. ? It’s the same with Google+. It’s just a case of old wine in new bottle. Facebook or Google+, or both. Whatever you suits you.

X – Chromosome X – Google+ does seem to have that air of prejudice where it already considers itself better than anything else. But, despite everything, it seems, Google has finally found that Chromosome X lying in some corner of their Mountain View Office which can possibly make G+ capable of throwing a serious challenge at the reigning Heavy Weight Champion - Facebook.

Y – Young – G+ is still in its early days, almost an infant from a social networking point of view. Although, initial signs may point at G+ to be a prodigy but it’s premature to call it a “Legend Killer”. Give it some time and let the kid breath and stop jumping to conclusions yet. Let the time speak…!

Z – Zuckerberg Mark – Mark Zuckerberg has been added in circles by highest no. of people 429868* on G+. This figure is more than the combined strength of Google founders Larry Page (250487*) & Sergey Brin’s (171456*) followers. That’s like someone crashing in your birthday party and becoming the most popular guy in the house. It seems Mr. Zuckerberg, whose bio reads “I make things”, is keeping an eye on the competition. No harm in being a little cautious, right Mark?



Source:- http://www.hindustantimes.com/

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

'Related' Browser Add-On: Handy, But at Cost to Privacy

A nifty Google browser extension called "Google Related" makes finding associated Web content a snap, but for privacy-minded Web surfers the convenience will come with a hefty cost. The Chrome Web browser extension creates a navigation bar at the bottom of the browser, and as you roll your mouse cursor over the bar Google generates content relevant to what's on the page you're viewing.

Google announced the Web browser extension Tuesday for its Google Chrome Web browser. The Google Related add-on takes the form of a toolbar for Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser. No support for Apple's Safari, Firefox, or Opera Web browser software was announced.

google relatedGoogle Related images (click to enlarge image)I took the Google Related for a spin and liked it. It's easy to see how it can become one of those "must have" extensions. While the content displayed by Related may be limited in volume, it's still valuable for fleshing out the content of a webpage or providing jumping off points for additional searches.

google relatedGoogle Related video (click to enlarge image)Here is how it works. Google Related creates a strip of buttons that pop into view when you hover your cursor over the bottom edge of your browser. Hovering on a button displays a list of content -- video, images, news, maps, reviews, shopping and Web pages -- related to the content on the Web page.

Button categories are also tied to the Web page's content. For instance, if you're on a restaurant page, the buttons allow you to pop up a map to the eatery, read reviews of it, and see related restaurants in the same area. On a news page, you might see a button for news related to stories on the page, one websites relevant to those stories and another for related images.

The tool doesn't work with all websites. It didn't work with Internet Movie Data Base, for instance or, ironically, with Google.com pages when I visited those sites.

google relatedGoogle Related offers information on restaurants (click to enlarge image)What I liked best about the add-on was the fact that when I was visiting a site the tool was "smart" enough to figure out the character of the site -- a restaurant, for instance, or shopping site -- and configure itself in a way that was relevant to the location. So when I stopped by one of my favorite Italian restaurant sites, I could see a map to it, not that I needed it, and reviews of it, also superfluous in this case, and related restaurants, which could be used when in an adventuresome mood. But when calling up a product in Amazon, it provided buttons for comparing products and related video and images.

Google is careful to alert potential users of Related that the tool gathers information about the pages you visit and sends it back to Google. You can hide the tool for specific websites through its options menu. On the Google toolbar, you can disable it entirely through that tool's options menu.

Information collected by Related includes the URL of website visited, your machine's IP address and one or more Google cookies. That data is retained in Google's server logs and maintained according to its general Privacy Policy.

google relatedGoogle Related raises company information (click to enlarge image)In addition to that information, Google says it may collect non-personal usage statistics about your installation of Related, such as the version number, language and how often certain actions are taken in the extension. These usage statistics do not include personal information such as your Google Account information, email or name.

Google says it uses the information gathered from Related to operate and improve the tool.

Google Related might not be for everyone, but if you can look past privacy issues and are type of Web surfer who appreciates a deeper dive into related content your viewing without having to revisit Google.com this extension is for you.


Source:- http://www.pcworld.com/article/238363/related_browser_addon_handy_but_at_cost_to_privacy.html


Firefox 6: 4 Reasons to Upgrade

Mozilla has more than a thousand changes under the hood of the latest version of Firefox, but only few provide worthwhile reasons for upgrading to the newest release of the browser.

All about the speed

The first reason is speed, although that point is debatable. According to Mozilla, startup times with Firefox 6 are better than its predecessor, especially if a user is using Firefox's Panorama feature. Panorama allows users to organize tabs into groups. Having Firefox launch several groups on startup has been a sure-fire way to bog down that process in the past.

Firefox 6: 4 Reasons to UpgradeAny speed improvements over the sluggish performance of Firefox 5 is welcome news for users, but overall performance of Firefox's latest incarnation appears to be more problematic. For example, Dan Howley pointed out in Laptop magazine that Firefox 6 is actually slower than its progenitor when evaluated with a benchmarking program called Peacemaker.

Peacemaker evaluates a browser's performance using Java and assigns a score to it. The higher the score, the better the performance. Firefox 6 had a score of 4.572 when Howley ran Peacemaker on it. That's slightly lower than Firefox 5, which scored 4.733. By comparison, Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 scored 4.830 and Chrome got 8.400.

Benchmarking scores, though, can be deceptive, which may be the case with Firefox 6. It may score lower than the previous release of the program, but from a user's point of view, it feels faster.

URL display

Another reason to upgrade to Firefox 6 is the way it displays URLs in the address bar. The domain of a website is more distinct than the rest of its address. So in a URL like http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/6.0/releasenotes/, www.mozilla.com would be emphasized.

That's a feature that Chrome and IE9 have had for some time. While it seems like a simple addition, it's valuable for quickly spotting if a URL is questionable, as might be the case if a user clicks on larcenous link in a phishing message.

Security

Security is also bolstered in Firefox 6 with a new permissions feature. It allows a user to configure the permissions for a particular website by typing "about:permissions" on the address bar. With it, a user can configure such things as acceptance of cookies, location sharing, pop-ups, passwords and data storage.

Why is that a selling point for Firefox 6? It lets a user beef up the overall security of the browser, while letting the person remove restrictions on sites they trust. By choosing tough restrictions as the default security settings for the software, a user can be better protected against accidently visiting a malicious website and getting their computer infected with malware. Yet, users don't have to worry about the restrictions creating a barrier to productive use of trusted sites.

It's free

The fourth reason for upgrading to Firefox 6 is probably the least compelling, but also the most irresistible. Firefox 6 is a free upgrade to a favorite program. What more reason does a user need?


Source:- http://www.pcworld.com/

Microsoft lists 'App Store' as a Windows 8 feature

An App Store is officially among the features Microsoft is working to include in Windows 8, much like Apple's App Store for OS X.

The revelation, which confirmed months of rumors, came today from Microsoft President Steven Sinofsky in a Building Windows 8 blog titled "Introducing the team." Among a list of teams associated with building the forthcoming operating system was "App Store."

Sinofsky said that work on the new OS is organized by feature teams, of which there are about 35, each containing 25 to 40 developers.

"Many of the teams listed below describe features or areas that you are familiar with or that you can probably figure out based on the name," he said. "As we post more, team members will identify themselves as part of these teams."

Microsoft representatives did not immediately respond to a request for further comment.

Rumors and reports about an upcoming Windows app store have been around for more than a year. Based on a series of Windows 8 documents leaked June 2010, Microsoft has reportedly been eager to match Apple at its own game by offering its own dedicated app store.

The App Store appeared in demonstration of Windows 8 that Sinofsky gave at the All Things Digital D9 conference in late June. Included in the start-up menu tiles was a direct link to a Microsoft Store, which suggests Microsoft was working it own version of an online application store, similar to the Mac App Store.

The company has also been working hard to keep Apple from winning a U.S. trademark for the phrase App Store. The company argues the phrase is too generic to register and would restrict competitors' ability to use of the term to describe their own services.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said in May that the new OS would reach consumers in 2012, although the company later said Ballmer misspoke. In June, Vice President Dan'l Lewin hinted that Windows 8 would launch during the fall of 2012.

Google Related collects relevant content at the foot of Chrome

Google has released a new service entitled Google Related, a "browser assistant" Chrome extension intended to direct users to webpages on the same topic as the one they're currently viewing. While some applications of the service, like getting extra info during a restaurant search, are useful, some others produce unhelpful suggestions in a framework that should be more trainable than it is.

Once you have the Google Related extension installed, a bar will begin appearing along the bottom of certain types of pages, such as news, shopping, or restaurant websites. Various tabs allow you access to content related to that page—visiting a restaurant's website may produce a tab with a Google map of the restaurant's address, a second tab with reviews, and a third tab of related locations (as identified by Google Maps).

The restaurant website suggestions are the most coherent, as the previous list nails exactly what I'm looking for when I look up a restaurant. But some of the tabs are too selective and Google-centric (unsurprisingly), as when the Reviews tab produces Google Places reviews and links to the Urban Spoon page, but not to Yelp.

A Google Related tab produced from a news story concerning an HTC vs. Apple patent spat.

Visiting a page with a news story will produce a dropdown (or more accurately, a shoot-up) of culled news stories on the same topic from other sources. The displayed stories seem limited to the most recent updates you might find at the top of a Google News search, a format better for the rarer breaking stories than authoritative ones getting picked up over and over in brief by multiple news outlets. The pullquote in the HTC vs. Apple-produced tab above is a nice feature, but the content is only barely related to the story.

What the extension lacks the most is the ability to train it. Links offered from the Related bar are +1-able, but if you click the "View More Articles" link from the story above, you get a get a long list of stories from various outlets that can't be +1'd. This strikes us as a prime opportunity to teach Google Related which sources you trust or would like to see in your related news tab when you visit a news story. Still, true to Google form, Google is collecting statistics on the project, so we may be training it more than we know.

Given Google's recent "more wood behind fewer arrows" declaration, the only-partially-useful Related is a mystifying addition to the company's product slate in its current state. The extension is available today for all Chrome users.


Source:- http://arstechnica.com/

Facebook Blocking Google+ Invite Posts?

Reports surfaced today that Facebook may be blocking posts that encourage users to try out rival social network, Google+. A video was posted this morning by a Google employee pointing out something peculiar he noticed about how his friends’ news feeds would show his regular status updates but would exclude one’s with a link to Google+.

The video was subsequently linked to by Google senior VP Vic Gundotra, who asked on Google+ whether others were experiencing this same problem. He notes that the company was “getting reports” from other users of this behavior. This, of course, sparked speculation that Facebook may be intentionally blocking Google+ related posts.

However, Facebook disagrees and has responded saying that the company could not duplicate the same problem as depicted in the video. The company also noted that they have display-filtering technology that help prevent spam and thus could exclude certain links from re-appearing on a user’s news feed if it had previously been posted several times.

Additionally, there are others that speculate this could be a Google gimmick to spur distrust for the Facebook platform while bringing more attention to Google. CNET was also unable to duplicate the problem while other users from Gundotra’s Google+ thread reported mixed results.


Source:- http://www.slashgear.com/

Mozilla ships Firefox 6, patches 10 vulnerabilities

Computerworld - Mozilla today released Firefox 6, the second edition since it shifted to a rapid-ship cycle that delivers a new version of the browser every six weeks.

The company also patched 10 bugs with the upgrade, and issued an update to 2010's Firefox 3.6 that fixed seven flaws total, six of them different than the ones quashed in Firefox 6.

Today's release of Firefox 6 was the second time in a row that Mozilla met its self-imposed deadline since the debut of a faster shipping schedule in March. Mozilla has historically struggled to ship browser upgrades on time, but is now 2-for-2 after picking up the pace.

Although Mozilla listed more than 1,600 changes to Firefox 6 in a full bug list, the open-source developer called out only a few in its release notes, among them highlighting domain names in the address bar -- both Chrome and Microsoft's Internet Explorer 9 (IE9) do something similar by boldfacing domain names -- reducing startup time and for developers, adding a JavaScript prototyping tool called Scratchpad.

There is very little difference between Firefox 6's user interface and that of its immediate predecessor, Firefox 5, or the slightly older Firefox 4.

Under the hood, however, Mozilla has added a new permissions manager that lets advanced users tweak options on a per site basis. The new manager, which can be reached by typing "about:permissions" in the browser's address bar, can be used to modify settings for password capture, cookies, pop-ups and more.

On the security front, Mozilla patched vulnerabilities in both Firefox 3.6 and Firefox 6.

Five of the seven bugs fixed in Firefox 3.6.20 were rated "critical," the company's most serious threat rating; the two exceptions were tagged as "high."

Eight of the 10 bugs quashed in Firefox 6 were also rated critical, with two labeled high.

Because Mozilla now bundles virtually all security patches with each version upgrade, users stuck on Firefox 4 are now running a browser vulnerable to 20 different bugs.

According to Web metrics vendor Net Applications, about 9% of the people using Firefox as of the end of July were running Firefox 4.

One of the critical vulnerabilities patched today was in Firefox's implementation of WebGL, a 3-D rendering standard that both Chrome and Firefox comply with. The bug was reported to Mozilla by a researcher with Context Information Security, a company that has cited serious security issues with WebGL.

Previously, Context recommended that users and administrators disable WebGL in Chrome and Firefox.


Source:- http://www.computerworld.com

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

A buyer's guide for 10-inch tablet

We now have a marketplace for 10inch tablets other than Apple's iPad.

Most of the new models have bet the farm on Google's Android OS and are hoping that they will succeed as wildly and as quickly on the tablet space as they did in smartphones.

Samsung, Motorola and Toshiba are among the players in this space.

Like Apple, HP is pushing their own hardware and software platforms hoping that customers who want 'something different', might subscribe to their approach and ecosystem.

Here's our quick guide to navigating this new and competitive space.

Bargain Tablets ($399 to $499)

HP's TouchPad

On sale right now at $399 for the 16GB version, HP's hoping its webOS tablet catches on. Sporting a 1.2GHz dual core processor, a 1.3 megapixel front facing camera and more importantly an improved webOS touch experience in a tablet. The TouchPad also features powerful Beats Audio speakers and a robust feature set. Going forward, it should interface wirelessly with compatible webOS phones.

Acer Iconia Tab

The most affordable Android Honeycomb tablet right now is probably the Acer Iconia Tab ($399 for 16GB) that presents a wellrounded feature set at an acceptable size. Acer has loaded this with a bright 10.1-inch, 1280 x 800 TFT LCD, mini HDMI port and a decent seven-hour battery life. Not the thinnest or the lightest, the Iconia Tab has proven to be one of the more powerful of the current batch of Androids.

Toshiba Thrive

An Android Honeycomb powered tablet (starting at $429) that brings a lot of PC-focused features into the market. Nothing beats the Thrive in terms of ports and connectivity since it comes with a full sized SD Card Slot (SD, SDHC, MMC) Full Size USB 2.0, Mini USB, Full-Size HDMI, 3.5mm Standard Headphone Jack, Docking Connector, DC Input. This is the working man's tablet with great connectivity options.

Motorola XOOM

Now selling at $499 for the 32GB version, Motorola's XOOM WiFI tablet offers a powerful dual core processor, premium aluminum body and is one of the fastest Honeycomb tablets we've tested. Premium look and feel as well as a stunning screen are the XOOM's most stunning features.

Cutting Edge Tablets ($500 and up)

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 4G

Samsung has produced the thinnest and lightest 10.1 tablet on any platform. With 4G data built in (price still unannounced), this is the most mobile 10.1 inch Honeycomb device around.

Aside from the basic Android tablet OS, Samsung has outfitted the Tab 10.1 with a file manager, unique and useful widgets and some curated apps and multimedia content.

This is definitely the most competitive Android tablet around and in terms of features.

The 4G version running on Telus is fast to access data and media.

Apple iPad 2 Wi-Fi +3G 64GB

The top-of-the-line iPad 2 ($849) comes with Wi-Fi and 3G data access and 64GB of storage.

Thinner and lighter than the previous model, the iPad 2 is also at least twice as speedy and with better video and graphics performance.

Dual cameras for Face-Time video chats plus the new iMessage service will endow all iOS devices with BBM (BlackBerry Messenger) type device-to-device messaging for free come September.

Currently the gold standard in tablets, the iPad has the apps, the ecosystem and a large user base to ensure continued success.

What's behind Google's Motorola gamble?

LOS ANGELES: Google's $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility Holdings, widely considered a mobile phone also-run, took the technology world by surprise.

To analysts, Google's pricey new toy will help it do everything from build up its nascent tablet business to prop up its ailing Google TV arm.

In the wake of the announcement, Google executives stressed that a major reason they shelled out $40 a share is for the 25,000 patents the company would get by buying the second-tier phone manufacturer.

Those patents will prevent Google competitors from suing the company over its designs for new products. It also will allow the Silicon Valley giant to launch legal assaults on those competitors.

"Our acquisition of Motorola will increase competition by strengthening Google's patent portfolio, which will enable us to better protect Android from anti-competitive threats from Microsoft, Apple and other companies," Google CEO Larry Page said.

Apple has been particularly aggressive in exploiting patent challenges in recent months, launching legal assaults on the likes of Samsung and HTC, which carry Google's Android operating system. This expensive move by Google is, in the estimation of many Silicon Valley tea leaf readers, a defensive maneuver.

"The real value would seem to be Motorola's patent stash, which Google thinks will be a valuable weapon in the high-stakes arms race that has recently started up," Peter Kafka wrote on AllThingsD. "Which is why Google executives used the word 'protect' at least six times while explaining the deal this morning."

As Google executives vowed to allow Motorola to operate at arm's length on a conference call with the media, the likelihood that the company would become immediately enmeshed in manufacturing mobile devices struck some analysts as slim.

After all, Motorola lags behind its competitors, and Google's Android platform is an open operating system featured on cellphones from the likes of Samsung and HTC. That has likely left Google smoothing ruffled feathers among its key competitors, who don't like the thought of a resurgent, cash-rich Motorola.

"I think if Google could have bought just the patents, they would have and not bought the handset business," Mark McKechnie, senior telecom analyst for ThinkEquity, told TheWrap. "It's a conflict for them to compete on a product basis with their customer, and the handset business compromises their overall ecosystem."

Google must also tread lightly as it faces the threat of regulatory rejection for its Motorola deal unless it can demonstrate that it will not leverage its new bauble to discourage competition in the growing smartphone market. It appeared likely that Google's bid would be approved on Monday afternoon, but sources told Bloomberg that the government might require the company to license patents to other competitors in order to get approved.

Though Motorola is the biggest acquisition in the company's history, it might not be the only billion-dollar move Google makes this week.

The company is still circling Hulu, and has the $1.5 billion its owners are looking to offload the popular online video site.

"This doesn't preclude them making another deal, even a large one," Mike Hickey, an analyst at Janco Partners, told TheWrap. "They have a lot of cash."


Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More