Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Google move hints at Chrome for Android

Android's unbranded browser is coming back into the WebKit fold.

The software--called simply "Browser" on Android phones and tablets--is based on the open-source browser engine called WebKit. It's long been disassociated from it, though, and now Google is trying to reunite the projects in a move that could portend the arrival of a branded Chrome on Android.

"We're looking forward to a much better collaboration with the WebKit community," Google's Andrei Popescu said yesterday in a mailing list message flagged by new Chrome developer Peter Beverloo and spotted by TechCrunch.

Convergence between the Android browser and Chrome seems inevitable. Tablets bring a more PC-like experience to browsing, and Google is of course keen on tablets with the arrival of version 3 of Android, aka Honeycomb. Google TV, also based on Android, has a browser that sports the Chrome brand. But what's been keeping them apart?

At the Google I/O show in May, Chrome Senior Vice President Sundar Pichai said it's because, although the browsers share some common code, the Android browser is "not based on Chromium," the open-source version of Chrome. The implication was that the Chrome brand name carries a certain promise of Web page compatibility that the Android browser couldn't necessarily fulfill.

By merging with the WebKit project, though, that barrier will be overcome. "We're fully committed to maintaining this new flavor of the Chromium port of WebKit," Popescu said in the message.

And when Beverloo filed a WebKit but to track the project, he said, "The Android Browser has come to a point where it shares enough code with Chrome to entirely reuse the Chromium port of WebKit."

The change is good news, according to Dion Almaer, a browser and Web development expert who mentioned the move on the Function Source blog today.

"Having watched my team deal with painful Android WebKit bugs for the last few weeks, I am very glad to read more news that the Android WebKit is getting Chrome-ier," Almaer said. "When you go deep on making a rich Web application work there, you find sharp corners all over the shop."

In other words, he expects some of the compatibility issues separating Chrome and the Android browser to diminish.

Google wouldn't comment on its branding plans for the browser. In a statement today, the company said:

The Android Browser and Chrome already share a lot of code, such as the same WebKit rendering engine, V8 JavaScript engine, and HTTP [Hypertext Transfer Protocol] stack. We expect them to continue to share more code over time and have actually started harmonizing our efforts so that Google will have just one port of WebKit to maintain. Beyond that, we have nothing further to share at this time.

It seems to me the Ice Cream Sandwich version of Android, due later this year, would be a great time to make the branding change. This version of the mobile operating system is designed to bridge the current divide between Android 2.x for phones and Android 3.x for tablets and to make it easier for Android app programmers to support multiple devices.

But re-integrating the Android browser with WebKit will take time--and it requires more than just Google's Chrome programmers working with Google's Android browser programmers. WebKit began as an Apple project spawned from the earlier KHTML browser engine used in the KDE interface for Linux, so other developers are involved.

One potential benefit to Google's move is a more mature mobile browser for others. Safari on iOS uses WebKit, and so do browsers for new BlackBerry phones, Samsung Bada phones, Hewlett-Packard's ill-fated WebOS, and more. Open-source software makes sharing software easier, and Google's goals with browsers are not so much to profit directly from its own product as to improve browsing in general so the Web becomes more powerful.

Google sometimes keeps variations of open-source projects in-house. The Linux kernel used in Android, for example, is fairly detached from the mainstream Linux kernel project maintained by Linus Torvalds. That doesn't violate any laws and gives Google the ability to control its own destiny a bit better, but as a practical matter, the open-source philosophy works better when projects aren't fragmented and out of sync.

It's a two-way road, too: Google should have an easier time incorporating others' changes into the Android browser. If Apple comes up with a clever CSS feature, for example, it'll be less effort for Google to incorporate it.

Thus, overall, Google's WebKit move with its Android browser seems helpful for Web developers, browser makers, and Android users. And one last point: there's no doubt that Google, which is sensitive to branding issues, would love to see that Chrome icon publicized on millions of smartphones.

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Major Google Updates Documented

SEOmoz announced they have published the Google Algorithm Change document detailing all “major updates” that happened since the Boston update in 2003.

SEOmoz did it with style in this graphical document:

While I agree with a lot of the updates listed here, I had worked up a list of my own a few months ago. I was extremely selective and this it he list I came up with the list below.

My Google Update List:

  • Fritz (Summer 2003)
  • Florida (November 2003)
  • Austin Update (Jan 2004)
  • The Sandbox (April 2004)
  • Bourbon (May 2005)
  • Big Daddy (October 2005)
  • Supplemental (Jan 2007)
  • Paid Links (October 2007)
  • Dewey Update (Mar 2008)
  • Vince / Brand (March 2009)
  • May Day (May 2010)
  • Caffeine (June 2010)
  • Scraper Filter (Jan. 2011)
  • Panda (February 2011)

SEOmoz Google Update List:

  • Google Toolbar – December 2000
  • Boston – February 2003
  • Cassandra – April 2003
  • Dominic – May 2003
  • Esmerelda – June 2003
  • Fritz – July 2003
  • Florida – November 2003
  • Austin – January 2004
  • Brandy – February 2004
  • Google IPO – August 2004
  • Nofollow – January 2005
  • Allegra – February 2005
  • Bourbon – May 2005
  • XML Sitemaps – June 2005
  • Personalized Search – June 2005
  • Gilligan – September 2005
  • Google Local/Maps – October 2005
  • Jagger – October 2005
  • Big Daddy – December 2005
  • Supplemental Index – November 2006
  • Universal Search – May 2007
  • Buffy – June 2007
  • Dewey – April 2008
  • Google Suggest – August 2008
  • Vince – February 2009
  • Rel-canonical Tag – February 2009
  • Caffeine – August 2009
  • Real-time Search – December 2009
  • Google Places – April 2010
  • May Day – May 2010
  • Brand Update – August 2010
  • Google Instant – September 2010
  • Instant Previews – November 2010
  • Social Signals – December 2010
  • Overstock.com Penalty – January 2011
  • Panda/Farmer – February 23, 2011
  • The +1 Button – March 30, 2011
  • Panda 2.0 – April 11, 2011
  • Panda 2.1 – May 9, 2011
  • Schema.org – June 2, 2011
  • Panda 2.2 – June 21, 2011
  • Google+ – June 28, 2011
  • Panda 2.3 – July 23, 2011

Both SEOmoz and I pulled a lot of this data from this WebmasterWorld thread, which has always done a great job of documenting Google updates. I supplemented my list above with the Google Updates category on the Search Engine Roundtable.

The main difference is that SEOmoz is also including major user interface changes and none specific algorithm changes, including specific penalties.

Overall, it is really good for SEOs and webmasters to get an idea of how Google has updated their index, algorithms and penalties over time so that you can better anticipate the future changes coming from Google.


Source:- http://searchengineland.com

Google Updates iOS Search App With Instant Pages

Google updated its Search app for iOS today with the addition of several new features that will make searching faster and more convenient. Most noticeable is the addition of a filter button in the search bar that makes it easy to quickly select which categories to search under. Also added is support for Google’s Instant Pages feature, which was first introduced for the Chrome desktop browser back in June.

The Google Search app is much more powerful than its Safari browser counterpart. Besides typing in your search query, you can input your search using speech as well as using photos from your phone’s camera. The latter utilizes the experimental Google Goggles feature and finds search results relevant to photos of books, DVDs, landmarks, logos, contact info, artwork, businesses, products, QR barcodes, and more.

The addition of the filter button lets you narrow down your search results by selecting categories from a drop-down menu. These categories include Everything, Images, Places, News, Shopping, Videos, Blogs, Discussions, and Apps. Speaking of Apps, this new update also makes it easier to launch Google apps such as Gmail, Calendar, News, Translate, Reader, and more.

Support for Instant Pages means that certain search results that Google predicts that you’re most likely to click on will pre-load in the background so that when you do click on the result the page appears instantly. However, our attempts at trying out this feature by searching for “IRS” did not produce an instant page load of irs.gov. This could be blamed on our wireless data connection or that irs.gov was not predicted as the best result for that particular search. Hopefully, this feature will continue to be tweaked so we’ll see a more noticeable difference in page load times.

The app also has a help overlay that highlights the individual features. And swiping down from the top of the screen reveals the sign-in and settings options, which usually remain hidden so that more screen space is given for search results.



Source:- http://www.slashgear.com

Thursday, August 18, 2011

A to Z guide to Google+

A - Another Social Networking site – Or should I say, another social networking site from Google. *phew* A fter Google Wave failed to create any waves and everyone asked Google Buzz to Buzz off, this is Google’s third attempt at taking Facebook head on (not considering Orkut as it was developed before Facebook became famous).

B – Businesses (separate acc. St rategy) – Google doesn’t want any company, business or product to have an account on Google+. Not right now, at least. They’re completely clear with their strategy and currently, all the accounts are only for Homo sapiens. Google+ has a separate strategy for businesses and they’re right now busy refining the last bits. In Product Manager, Chr istian Olsten’s words, “We have been watching Google+ take shape over the last week and we’ve seen some really great companies get involved. But frankly we know our product as it stands is not optimally suited to their needs. In fact, it was kind of an awkward moment for us when we asked Ford for his (or was it her?) gender!”

C – Circles – Google+ lets you add all your friends in different circles hence you can safely post that NSFW video and share it with your College Circle without worrying that your aunt from Amritsar will see it. You can also tell all your friends that you’re chilling in Goa while keeping your boss who’s in the Do-not-share-anything-with-Boss Circle, under the impression that you’re down with viral. Here are some other circles you can possibly use to categorise your friends. Facebook friends circle, Twitter friends circle, Real life friends circle, Colleagues-to- be-included-in-conversation-while-ranting-about-office circle, Family-members-you-can’t-tell-you-like-DK-Bose-song circle.

D – Di rect Messages – One of the most unique feature of G+ is how to Direct Message or Inbox someone. Technically speaking, there is no ‘Inbox’ feature. You never go in that shell where you feel safe, secure and private to make personal conversations like Facebook, Twitter & Orkut. Everything stays on the Timeline. Only difference is, you share the post only with that particular person(s) instead of sharing it with ‘Public’ or a circle. It can be classified as Direct Message in a way, but it will take some time and plenty of near-misses getting used to it, as that security of conversing in private folder cocoon is out of the window.


E – Equinox – Here, equinox can be referred to as that site which has found a balance between Facebook & Twitter and have engineered their way in combining best (functionalities) of both world, which in a parallel universe caters to the entire spectrum of users.

F – Following/followers – “People in your circles / People who’ve you in their circle” sounds more like “People you’re following / People who’re following you”. Google+’s friend list resemble Twitter more than Facebook.

G – Gtalk – Users have faced awkward situations where they’re being pinged on the Gtalk by people they’ve never added in the first place. Turns out, when you mutually add each other on G+, they get automatically added to your Gtalk. Given the fact that Google already has Gtalk, you don’t really expect them to program a new chat server, do you?

H – Hahaha gifs
- They logged on, they uploaded and they left. Since the first day, G+ has been littered with gifs and jpgs of how G+ has kicked FB’s butt. It’s either a cheap marketing ploy by Google where they’ve asked their employees to circulate these images or they’ve been created by anti-facebookers who’ve been waiting for someone to do come up with something that can rival FB.

I – Invitation – This yawn-worthy marketing tactic have now official earned a ‘cliché’ status. Like every new website/product wants you to think that they’re going to let only a select few mere mortals have the honour of testing their new thingy and to earn that once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, you will be required to cry out loud on Twitter and Facebook a million times to gain a so-called ‘invitation’ which will catapult you to Megatron levels of stardom and will change your life forever, even Google+ created the same noise where people were ready to give up their one limb to earn that coveted invitation to be one of the first people to have an account on Google+. Google+ created hype by giving out only a few thousand invitations in first few days which have now swelled to millions. In fact, Google did the same with Buzz and Wave. Grow up Google, instead of using such tactics, just make a great product, user base will take care of itself.

J - Just in time - G+ was launched on 28th June ‘11. Just 24 hours later, on 29th June, Myspace fell for just $35 million. MySpace was launched in 2003, a full year before Facebook, and it had peaked popularity in 2007 when it was valued at $12 billion. If symbolism is anything to go by, Google might just have launched G+ at a critical point of time. Just in time, as some would say.

K – Kleptomania – Maybe. Although, G+ has tried to stay away from the Facebook structure as much as possible and despite using terminologies as different from Facebook as possible, similarity to FB is pretty obvious. It's evident that G+ is nothing but a cross between Facebook and Twitter from features point of view.

L – Links – As of now, for an average user there is rarely anything to do on G+ apart from checking out tons of links that everyone is forwarding on G+. There are hardly any photos or any unique updates about friends which you haven’t read before on FB and/or twitter. It will take some time till the site gets populated and one can actually think of spending (read wasting) substantial amount of time on Google+.

M – Mute – All those people who’ve regretted congratulating a friend on his new relationship status after being bombarded with half a million notifications, will love this feature. In short, all of us. Mute allows us to mute notification about comments that people post on the same updates which we’ve commented on, hence, you will no longer feel shy to comment “RIP” on your friend’s “Getting married next week” update.

N – Nice, but not enough – Would G+ be able to overhaul Facebook can be answered in just 4 words, “(It's)Nice, but not enough.”

O – Omnipresent - Development of G+ has finally got Google, the omnipresent status. Google had every trick in the book, from Google Docs, Google Earth & Gmail to image sharing Flickr, video sharing YouTube & a blogging portal in Blogspot; a truly global social networking site was the only thing that was missing. With G+, it seems circle is complete. Although, some would argue that Google already had Orkut, but as mentioned, Google really wanted a GLOBAL social networking site and according to their Google Earth, the planet has 200+ countries and not just India & Brazil. Hence, G+.

P – Plus one – Plus One or +1 is equivalent to Facebook’s ‘Like’. But +1ing on Google+ won’t make it appear in your +1 section, so you needn’t worry that your family will come to know that you’ve +1ed Tara Reid’s Wardrobe Malfunction video unless you +1 it anywhere on net.

Q – Quintessentially minimalistic – Like everything Google, G+ too followed Google’s classic design philosophy and kept the site to bare minimum. Let’s enjoy the neatness and spaciousness that the site offers, till Adwords fills up the empty space.

R – Reality Check – Google+ is the fastest growing website but still it’s far from catching up with Facebook’s 750+ million users. And Facebook is just one step away from Gmail once @facebook.com mail id starts working in its full fledged avatar.

S – Sparks – There are no fan pages on G+ instead they have something known as Sparks which is essentially RSS feed of things that interests you, which may range from anything from “Aston Martin” to “Hot pics of Katrina Kaif”. Google seem to have employed some complex algorithm which probably takes into consideration page hits/rank from a little know search engine known as Google.com, to decide which news/links to throw up for your Sparks

T – 25 Million users – Google+ has already crossed the 25 million user mark is the fastest social networking website to reach this mark. Don’t get impressed by the fastest-social-networking-site-to-reach-25m-mark award, yet. Given Google’s might and the fact that it only took a Gmail account to register for Google+, it’s no surprise that they’ve achieved that feat in only a month’s time. The so-called “by invitation only” was only a marketing gimmick.

U – Unlimited photos – 1 album = 1000 photos. Unlimited albums = Unlimited Photos. Wohoo!!!

V – Video Chatting – Video Chat or Hangout as they call it, has to be G+ ‘s “deal maker”. The fact that one can video chat with up to 10 people at the same time is for sure a big plus.

W – Why should I be on G+? – That’s question you will be left asking yourself…So, what’s the point of G+? Well, let me ask you, what’s the point of any social networking site? Photos, Connectivity, News, Interaction, Staying in touch, Status Updates…. ? It’s the same with Google+. It’s just a case of old wine in new bottle. Facebook or Google+, or both. Whatever you suits you.

X – Chromosome X – Google+ does seem to have that air of prejudice where it already considers itself better than anything else. But, despite everything, it seems, Google has finally found that Chromosome X lying in some corner of their Mountain View Office which can possibly make G+ capable of throwing a serious challenge at the reigning Heavy Weight Champion - Facebook.

Y – Young – G+ is still in its early days, almost an infant from a social networking point of view. Although, initial signs may point at G+ to be a prodigy but it’s premature to call it a “Legend Killer”. Give it some time and let the kid breath and stop jumping to conclusions yet. Let the time speak…!

Z – Zuckerberg Mark – Mark Zuckerberg has been added in circles by highest no. of people 429868* on G+. This figure is more than the combined strength of Google founders Larry Page (250487*) & Sergey Brin’s (171456*) followers. That’s like someone crashing in your birthday party and becoming the most popular guy in the house. It seems Mr. Zuckerberg, whose bio reads “I make things”, is keeping an eye on the competition. No harm in being a little cautious, right Mark?



Source:- http://www.hindustantimes.com/

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Facebook Blocking Google+ Invite Posts?

Reports surfaced today that Facebook may be blocking posts that encourage users to try out rival social network, Google+. A video was posted this morning by a Google employee pointing out something peculiar he noticed about how his friends’ news feeds would show his regular status updates but would exclude one’s with a link to Google+.

The video was subsequently linked to by Google senior VP Vic Gundotra, who asked on Google+ whether others were experiencing this same problem. He notes that the company was “getting reports” from other users of this behavior. This, of course, sparked speculation that Facebook may be intentionally blocking Google+ related posts.

However, Facebook disagrees and has responded saying that the company could not duplicate the same problem as depicted in the video. The company also noted that they have display-filtering technology that help prevent spam and thus could exclude certain links from re-appearing on a user’s news feed if it had previously been posted several times.

Additionally, there are others that speculate this could be a Google gimmick to spur distrust for the Facebook platform while bringing more attention to Google. CNET was also unable to duplicate the problem while other users from Gundotra’s Google+ thread reported mixed results.


Source:- http://www.slashgear.com/

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

What's behind Google's Motorola gamble?

LOS ANGELES: Google's $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility Holdings, widely considered a mobile phone also-run, took the technology world by surprise.

To analysts, Google's pricey new toy will help it do everything from build up its nascent tablet business to prop up its ailing Google TV arm.

In the wake of the announcement, Google executives stressed that a major reason they shelled out $40 a share is for the 25,000 patents the company would get by buying the second-tier phone manufacturer.

Those patents will prevent Google competitors from suing the company over its designs for new products. It also will allow the Silicon Valley giant to launch legal assaults on those competitors.

"Our acquisition of Motorola will increase competition by strengthening Google's patent portfolio, which will enable us to better protect Android from anti-competitive threats from Microsoft, Apple and other companies," Google CEO Larry Page said.

Apple has been particularly aggressive in exploiting patent challenges in recent months, launching legal assaults on the likes of Samsung and HTC, which carry Google's Android operating system. This expensive move by Google is, in the estimation of many Silicon Valley tea leaf readers, a defensive maneuver.

"The real value would seem to be Motorola's patent stash, which Google thinks will be a valuable weapon in the high-stakes arms race that has recently started up," Peter Kafka wrote on AllThingsD. "Which is why Google executives used the word 'protect' at least six times while explaining the deal this morning."

As Google executives vowed to allow Motorola to operate at arm's length on a conference call with the media, the likelihood that the company would become immediately enmeshed in manufacturing mobile devices struck some analysts as slim.

After all, Motorola lags behind its competitors, and Google's Android platform is an open operating system featured on cellphones from the likes of Samsung and HTC. That has likely left Google smoothing ruffled feathers among its key competitors, who don't like the thought of a resurgent, cash-rich Motorola.

"I think if Google could have bought just the patents, they would have and not bought the handset business," Mark McKechnie, senior telecom analyst for ThinkEquity, told TheWrap. "It's a conflict for them to compete on a product basis with their customer, and the handset business compromises their overall ecosystem."

Google must also tread lightly as it faces the threat of regulatory rejection for its Motorola deal unless it can demonstrate that it will not leverage its new bauble to discourage competition in the growing smartphone market. It appeared likely that Google's bid would be approved on Monday afternoon, but sources told Bloomberg that the government might require the company to license patents to other competitors in order to get approved.

Though Motorola is the biggest acquisition in the company's history, it might not be the only billion-dollar move Google makes this week.

The company is still circling Hulu, and has the $1.5 billion its owners are looking to offload the popular online video site.

"This doesn't preclude them making another deal, even a large one," Mike Hickey, an analyst at Janco Partners, told TheWrap. "They have a lot of cash."


Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More